Claude Fable 5.1

By Anthropic. 11 results on 7 boards, copied as published. Different boards, different metrics: don't add them up.

License (as listed)Proprietary
Hosting regionNot confirmed
Boards7
Code
  • 90.52%Vals AI — LiveCodeBench

    Claude Fable 5.1 · Accuracy % · board #1

    Vals AI implementation (no agent) · as of 2026-09-01 Stale ↗

  • 57.88%Terminal-Bench 4.0

    Fable 5.1 (xhigh) · Accuracy %

    Claude Code · as of 2026-09-01 ↗

  • 54.55%Terminal-Bench 4.0

    Fable 5.1 (high) · Accuracy %

    Claude Code · as of 2026-09-01 ↗

  • 53.94%Terminal-Bench 4.0

    Fable 5.1 (medium) · Accuracy %

    Claude Code · as of 2026-09-01 ↗

  • 43.33%Terminal-Bench 4.0

    Fable 5.1 (low) · Accuracy %

    Claude Code · as of 2026-09-01 ↗

Agentic / terminal
  • 57.88%Terminal-Bench 4.0

    Fable 5.1 (max) · Resolution rate

    Claude Code · as of 2026-09-01 ↗

Websites
  • 1742LMArena WebDev Arena

    Claude Fable 5.1 (Max) · Arena score · board #5

    LMArena WebDev (agentic front-end tasks) · as of 2026-10-22 ↗

  • 90.26%Vals AI Vibe Code Bench v1.1

    Claude Fable 5.1 · Score % · board #6

    OpenHands · as of 2026-10-20 ↗

  • 1326Design Arena (Fullstack)

    claude-fable-5-1 · Elo · board #2

    Design Arena · as of 2026-10-24 ↗

Design
  • 1334Design Arena (All categories)

    claude-fable-5-1 · Elo · board #11

    Design Arena · as of 2026-10-24 ↗

Android
  • 22.7%Android Bench 2.0 (long-horizon, 30 tasks)

    Claude Fable 5.1 · Pass rate

    claude-code · as of 2026-10-06 ↗

iOS

No mature public leaderboard

Available in

No plan row in our pricing data names this model version.

Use cases with this model

Test: "Muse Wonder Full 1.0 on real work. 2 repos. 105 bugs … GPT-6 Astra (max): 45 Muse Wonder Full 1.0 (max): 44 Fable 5.1 (max): 43 Opus 5.5…

Builder
@PawelHuryn
Posted
Plan
—
Cost
Not disclosed

x.com · link re-checked 2026-10-16

Same family: Claude 43

A Picasso-style three.js Tetris; Opus 5.5 also played and recorded the game itself

Builder
@SimonasLTU1
Posted
Plan
—
Cost
Not disclosed

x.com · link re-checked 2026-10-16

A game "in about two weeks". GPT-6.1 Sol made the assets, Opus 5.5 did "most of the coding and game logic"

Builder
@hakimieiqbal
Posted
Plan
—
Cost
Not disclosed

x.com · link re-checked 2026-10-16

Claude Opus 5.5Model test

Cost (user-reported): "look what it built through the API in 3 minutes for $0.19. Claude Opus 5.5 took 15 minutes and $2.61 on the same prompt."

Builder
@0xKense1
Posted
Plan
—
Cost
Not disclosed

x.com · link re-checked 2026-10-16

Rebuilt Shopify's four AI "gates" in headless Claude Code on tinydb and measured which gates catch bugs

Builder
AI Dive
Posted
Plan
Sonnet 5.5
Cost
Stated: $0.085" (no gate) to "$0.28" per run

dev.to · web source · link re-checked 2026-10-16

Test: "Same prompt and same references, Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 4 Argon. Opus did it in one shot. Argon got 3 rounds of feedback and still can't match…

Builder
@anxuanng
Posted
Plan
—
Cost
Not disclosed

x.com · link re-checked 2026-10-16

All 43 Claude use cases →

Sources

lmarena.ai/leaderboard/webdev vals.ai/benchmarks/vibe-code vals.ai/benchmarks/lcb developer.android.com/bench tbench.ai/leaderboard designarena.ai/leaderboard designarena.ai/leaderboard/fullstack

The weekly diff

What changed in AI coding plans: prices, limits, resets. Email signups open soon. Until then, updates go out on X.

Follow @QuietlyByG on X RSS feed

No email form yet, so we don't collect any email addresses.